Though the leaders remain responsible for the completion of the task, however, the decision making and problem-solving is delegated to subordinates.
Under this style, leader concentrates all authority in himself, instructs subordinates as to what to do, when to do it; how to do it, etc. That said, there are benefits to using this authoritarian leadership. However, it is also important to know that this approach will not always get the job done.
Individuals who work for autocratic leaders often fear one mistake will lead to termination. The autocratic leadership style negotiates from this stance of strength.
As there is no consultation with subordinates, Advantages of authoritarian leadership style matters can be kept secretly. Summary — When to Use This Style Authoritarian leadership has its place in management styles, however, the days of this one style working are long gone.
Home Pros and Cons 8 Advantages and Disadvantages of Democratic Leadership Style 8 Advantages and Disadvantages of Democratic Leadership Style Pros and Cons Sep 18, Basically, the democratic leadership style is a form of leading people that is found in human resources and participative management theory.
Possible Unrest of Citizens People who are not in favor of having a small group of people with power and who dictate on the lives of the citizens are concerned that there will come a time when these people will be sick and tired of their limited freedom.
Most appropriately, if tasks have to be completed with great urgency and are time critical, setting clear tasks and expectations whilst making the decisions seems a logical step, as often there is no time for discussion.
However, certain conditions and specific industries, such as the military, manufacturing and construction, thrive when a leader takes tight control and makes most of the decisions, according to Leadership-Toolbox.
Since a central government dictates on what products and services are to be offered as well as the number of products to be manufactured or sold in the market, business owners will not be able to monopolize the industry.
They sometimes, yet not generally, give clear desires to what should be done, when it ought to be done, and how it ought to be finished. Subordinates are expected to do what they are told.
At lower levels, only less competent subordinates are required. As it is negative in character, authoritarian approach will succeed only in the short run. In addition, members of Generation Y, workers born in the mids to s, usually do not respond well to autocratic leadership, according to LeadershipExpert.
This is because, subordinates get no opportunity for their development. The autocratic leadership style is one in which the boss expects compliance with all work duties and assigned tasks.
Since autocratic leaders settle on choices without counselling others, individuals in the community are likely to resent the fact that they are not able to contribute their thoughts and opinions. Mangers are poor motivators and employees hardly show creativity and judgment.
Also, the rights of the people are only acknowledged if these answer to the needs of the government. This type of governance is effective in a country where the previous government was not able to solve problems like insurgency, unemployment and corruption.An authoritarian leadership style is used when a leader manages strategies and techniques, chooses what objectives are to be accomplished, and coordinates and controls all exercises with no significant cooperation by the subordinates.
Read this article to discover the pro's and cons of this leadership style. Basically, the democratic leadership style is a form of leading people that is found in human resources and participative management theory.
From an organizational standpoint, this type of leadership includes redistributing power and authority between employees and managers to encourage employee involvement in the decision-making process.
So what are the advantages and disadvantages of the three leadership styles one would want to know? Autocratic or Authoritarian. An Autocratic or authoritarian leadership style will comprise of dictates and orders like telling aides what is to be done and how is something supposed to be done.
This form serves well when the time is at a premium, and the leader has all the information necessary to complete a. It is also associated to what is known as “blind leadership theory” in that the people have to obey the laws enacted by an authoritarian government.
Just like any other form of government, authoritarian leadership has its pros and cons. It helps to have an idea of its benefits and drawbacks for better understanding.
Advantages of Autocratic Style of leadership. Advantages of autocratic style of leadership are: 1. It provides for quick decision-making because here only one person i.e., the leader takes decisions. 2. Mostly subordinates like to work under centralized authority and strict supervision. 3. The benefits of Authoritarian Leadership.
For the long term, adopting nothing but an autocratic leadership style can be more damaging than rewarding, as it is seen as a cold, dictatorial, ‘I’m right’ management style, which can undermine people and stifle creativity.Download